Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.

Department of Surgery, Halland Hospital, 301 85, Halmstad, Sweden. kristina.ahsberg@med.lu.se. Institution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. kristina.ahsberg@med.lu.se. Department of Surgery, Blekinge Hospital, Karlskrona, Sweden. Institution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Institution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Unilabs Breast Centre, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Unilabs Breast Centre, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden. Department of Imaging and Functional Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

World journal of surgical oncology. 2020;(1):100
Full text from:

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate the added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in preoperative staging of malignant breast lesions, beyond standard assessment with digital mammography and ultrasound, as a base for a future prospective randomized trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-seven patients, with confirmed or strongly suspected malignant breast lesions after standard assessment (digital mammography (DM) and ultrasound (US)), scheduled for primary surgery, were invited to undergo CEM as an additional preoperative procedure. The primary endpoint was change in treatment due to CEM findings, defined as mastectomy instead of partial mastectomy or contrariwise, bilateral surgery instead of unilateral or neoadjuvant treatment instead of primary surgery. Accuracy in tumour extent estimation compared to histopathology was evaluated by Bland-Altman statistics. Number of extra biopsies and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS In 10/47 patients (21%), findings from CEM affected the primary treatment. Agreement with histopathology regarding extent estimation was better for CEM (mean difference - 1.36, SD ± 18.45) in comparison with DM (- 4.18, SD ± 26.20) and US (- 8.36, SD ± 24.30). Additional biopsies were taken from 19 lesions in 13 patients. Nine biopsies showed malignant outcome. No major adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION The feasibility of preoperative additional CEM was found to be satisfactory without any serious negative effects. Results imply an added value of CEM in preoperative staging of breast cancer. Further evaluation in larger prospective randomized trials is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03402529. Registered 18 January 2018-retrospectively registered.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Clinical Trial

Metadata